DSpace Собрание:
http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/286
2024-03-29T10:57:13ZDoes matter have non-dispositional intrinsic qualities? Sydney Shoemaker against quidditism
http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/20220
Название: Does matter have non-dispositional intrinsic qualities? Sydney Shoemaker against quidditism
Авторы: Sepetyi, D.; Сепетий, Дмитро Петрович
Аннотация: The article discusses the problem of the existence of the
fundamental non-dispositional intrinsic qualities of matter (quiddities) and
arguments for two opposite views, quidditism and dispositionalism (causal
structuralism). In support of quidditism, arguments by Howard Robinson,
John Foster and Philip Goff are deployed. These arguments highlight the
incoherence or unintelligibility of the doctrine that the whole reality is just a
network of causal relations without any qualitative filler in the nodes of the
network. Sydney Shoemaker’s influential argument for dispositionalism, in
the article «Causality and Properties», is analysed and responded. The case
is made that Shoemaker’s objections against the existence of fundamental
properties whose identity «consists of something logically independent of
their causal potentialities» can be neutralised on the assumption that our
world is operated by ontologically fundamental laws of nature in virtue of
which quiddities have constant causal potentialities. Quidditism with this
assumption makes it possible to know all the same properties of matter as
dispositionalism, viz., dispositional properties and spatiotemporal relations.
So, pace Shoemaker, it has no «disastrous epistemological consequences».
Although such quidditism expands (as compared with dispositionalism)
ontology by attributing matter not only with knowable dispositional
properties (causal structures) but also with quiddities, which are in a sense
unknowable, this ontological exuberance is justified by the need to avoid the
vicious regress of powers entailed by dispositionalism.2023-01-01T00:00:00ZThe evolutionary mechanisms for tolerance and social humanism development in education and medicine: a post-capitalist discourse
http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/20210
Название: The evolutionary mechanisms for tolerance and social humanism development in education and medicine: a post-capitalist discourse
Авторы: Utiuzh, I. H.; Kovtun, N.; Hrebin, S.; Vlasenko, F.; Volkova, V.; Утюж, Ірина Геннадіївна
Аннотация: The article is concerned with the substantive nature
of late capitalism, which determines all spheres of social existence.
It is clarified that neoliberal ideology forms a special
type of socio-cultural relations, in which the politics‟ technocratic
nature disregards humanitarian and cultural aspects and
doubts the very existence of the social. Under the circumstances
of IT intensified development and real crisis of capitalism,
the fundamental process of human-human interaction
is ignored, consequently resulting in the loss of the human‟s
fundamental feature, that is, his sociality. Socio-philosophical
research in modern realities is assigned to actualize the issues
of spiritual production related to preservation of the social as
the ontological essence of society existence in the future.
Therefore, our paper aims to analyze the socio-productive
function of education and medicine in the formation of a humanitarian
and anthropological model of preserving social
partnership and tolerance in modern society as opposed to the
disappointing and disturbing experience of chronic social pathologies,
medicalization and formation of the “remission society”
model within the framework of capitalism.
The formation of a humanitarian and anthropological
model of preserving the social consists in actualizing the evolutionary
mechanisms for social humanism, which is the
basic characteristic of the post-capitalist reality.2023-01-01T00:00:00ZThe Affective Determinants of Socialization in Terms of Structuralism
http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/20159
Название: The Affective Determinants of Socialization in Terms of Structuralism
Авторы: Sajtarly, I. A.; Utiuzh, I. G.; Утюж, Ірина Геннадіївна
Аннотация: This article is concerned with the issue of socialization in the context of considering the conceptual and methodological elaborations of structuralist thought representatives. This largely refers to modern social scholars, who have been involved in the studies of effective socialization mechanisms in so-called “advanced societies”. When examining the given issue, it was revealed that the criticism, inherent in postmodern post-structuralism as well as conceptualization of sociological structuralism are related to the common understanding of the productive determinants significance for “conserving” and, consequently, reproducing the established social order. Furthermore, the developers of these contemporary social thought concepts share a common belief in the dependence of the individual’s mental structure on the institutional framework of society. In other words, according to most representatives of the structuralist paradigm, the basic personality orientation patterns are a function of the social system, in which the individual was socialized. The same can be said about the individual’s affective-motivational structure, i.e., it largely depends on the specifics of the corresponding social system. Thus, the direct aim of this paper consists in revealing the general logic and arguments in favor of social determinism in the structuralist theory of personality development as well as considering the relevance of structuralist ideas as such.2023-01-01T00:00:00ZЗначення та інші проблеми семантики повсякденної мови (Передмова до українського перекладу статті Г. П. Ґрайса "Значення")
http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/19891
Название: Значення та інші проблеми семантики повсякденної мови (Передмова до українського перекладу статті Г. П. Ґрайса "Значення")
Авторы: Петік, Я.; Сепетий, Дмитро Петрович; Petik, Y.; Sepetyi, D. P.
Аннотация: У передмові до українського перекладу статті “Значення” Г. П. Ґрайса йдеться про особу відомого британо-
американського філософа, представника аналітичної філософії, його місця в ній та про вагомість його доробку у
царині семантики та філософії буденної мови. Перекладачі цієї статті зосередилися на особливостях й тонкощах
перекладу українською мовою. Вони звернули увагу на деякі поняття, наприклад “belief”, “meaning”, котрі не
можна однозначно перекласти, тому методологічно виправданим виявився контекстуальний переклад цих понять. The foreword to the very first Ukrainian translation of H. P. Grice’s article “Meaning” deals with the personality
of the famous British-American philosopher, a representative of analytical philosophy, and the importance of his work in
the field of semantics and ordinary language philosophy. Translators of this article focus on the features and subtleties of translation into Ukrainian. They drive attention to some concepts, for instance “belief”, “intention”, that cannot be
unambiguously translated into Ukrainian, therefore a contextual translation of such concepts is methodologically justified.
Описание: Сепетий Д. П. - ORCID: 0000-0003-2110-30442021-01-01T00:00:00Z